Public Safety Command Platform

Move from alert to case, evidence, and briefing without changing systems

Public Safety keeps search, casework, evidence handling, and export on one operator record so teams do not rebuild the investigation at every handoff.

01

CJIS-aligned access and audit controls

Access control, retention, audit, and export checks are inspectable

02

Cloud, sovereign, or air-gapped deployment paths

SaaS, sovereign cloud, private tenancy, or disconnected edge

03

Connector model for RMS, CAD, OSINT, and partner feeds

RMS, CAD, watchlists, partner feeds, and bespoke data sources

04

Independent assurance material available for review

Independent assurance material and control evidence are available through the security review path.

Investigation surface

Public Safety Command Platform

CJIS-aligned access and audit controls

Case, evidence, graph, and briefing stay on one operator record

Connector boundary

RMS, CAD, watchlists, partner feeds, and bespoke data sources

Case, evidence, graph, and briefing stay on one operator record

of investigator time disappears into manual search, re-entry, and system switching

40%

screens analysts may touch before a briefing reaches review

5-10

faster evidence-to-case availability when intake and verification stay on the same surface

50-70%

less administrative effort when briefing, export, and audit trail are built into the workflow

60%

Operational modules the site can actually defend

Operational modules the site can actually defend

The platform matters when search, casework, evidence, and briefing share the same record instead of being split across disconnected tools.

Operational modules the site can actually defend

Case, evidence, and coordination stay on one record

Alert

Notify investigators of actionable intelligence

Search external intelligence, internal records, and partner data from one surface, then move directly into review, correlation, and assignment.

Security and evidentiary control set

Preserve chain of custody while the case is still moving

Deployment boundary

SaaS, sovereign cloud, private tenancy, or disconnected edge

Evidence handling, verification, and export stay inside the working flow so teams are not rebuilding provenance at the end of the investigation.

A five-step path from intake to briefing packet

A five-step path from intake to briefing packet

Each step leaves something a supervisor, prosecutor, or reviewer can actually inspect.

Investigation flow

Input, normalize, correlate, review, and export on one command surface

The point is not another dashboard. The point is preserving context from intake through supervisor, prosecutor, or partner-agency handoff.

Investigation flow

Input, normalize, correlate, review, and export on one command surface

less administrative effort when briefing, export, and audit trail are built into the workflow

Step 1

Input

Take in evidence and source material without losing provenance at the door

Evidence and source records ready for review

30-90 seconds

Step 2

Normalize

Standardize formats, entities, and metadata so teams are reading one coherent case

Normalized records with entity and metadata structure

2-5 minutes

Step 3

Correlate

Link records, entities, and events into something analysts can test and defend

Correlation candidates with confidence and source context

3-8 minutes

Step 4

Review

Keep a human decision point before findings become case action

Reviewed findings with decision trail

5-30 minutes

Step 5

Export

Produce the packet, brief, or disclosure set directly from the live record

Briefing or export package with supporting references

2-5 minutes

Deployment and integration posture

Deployment and integration posture

Identity, transport, tenancy, and export decisions should be explicit before pilot, procurement, or security review.

Data model and APIs

REST and GraphQL interfaces expose the same record model used by operators, so integrations do not rely on a parallel demo schema.

Connector coverage

Use existing connectors where they fit, then extend into local feeds, partner systems, or niche intelligence sources without redesigning the case model.

Identity boundary

OIDC and SAML let agencies keep existing identity, role, and MFA controls instead of introducing another isolated account system.

Export and handoff

Packages for disclosure, partner exchange, and reporting come from the live record rather than a one-off reporting pipeline.

faster evidence-to-case availability when intake and verification stay on the same surface

50-70%

less manual recall work when search, entity review, and correlation share one record

40%

less administrative effort when briefing, export, and audit trail are built into the workflow

60%

lower stack complexity when case, evidence, search, and reporting stop living in separate systems

30-50%

Security and evidentiary control set

Security and evidentiary control set

Security review is only useful when it points to the real operating surface. These are the control areas teams inspect before they trust the workflow with sensitive investigations.

Infrastructure

Deployment options cover managed cloud, private tenancy, sovereign placement, and disconnected environments.

Encryption

Encryption and key handling are explicit across data at rest, transport, and exported evidence packages.

Access Control

Role-aware permissions, approval boundaries, and MFA protect investigator, supervisor, and admin actions.

Audit Logging

Audit events, review decisions, and export actions remain traceable for oversight and disclosure.

Assurance Review

Independent assurance material and control evidence are available through the security review path.

CJIS Alignment

Criminal justice access, authentication, logging, and review controls map cleanly into CJIS conversations.

Run your own workflow against the platform

Bring the sources, roles, export requirements, and review constraints that matter to your team. We will walk the real path instead of a generic demo.