Product

Investigation workflows for live public-safety casework

Run intake, graph analysis, evidence packaging, and disclosure from one command surface instead of forcing detectives to rebuild the case in separate systems.

Operational readout

shared across analysts, supervisors, and legal

1 case record

from intake packet to field briefing

<15 min

discipline baked into every handoff

CJIS + audit

same workflow across deployment models

Air-gap to cloud

Case discipline

The case should not fall apart at every handoff

Most agencies still intake in one tool, map relationships in another, brief leadership in slides, and then rebuild the evidence package for legal review. That creates delay and drift at the exact moment the case needs momentum.

Analysts, investigators, and supervisors work from one case ledger instead of copying status into disconnected systems.
Evidence, notes, and entity decisions stay attached to the same workflow so chain-of-custody and rationale are visible later.
Supervisors can see blocked tasks, aging leads, and incomplete packages before the case stalls in queue.

Designed for warrants, task-force briefings, major crime, and cross-border cases.

Argus Workspace

Case command surface

The command view keeps intelligence notes, tasking, relationship analysis, and case context in one operating picture.

Workflow map

Move the case from intake to filing without rebuilding it

The workflow is opinionated on purpose: triage the signal, build the network, assign action, and publish a defensible output package while the audit trail keeps pace.

Workflow rail

Case action and approvals stay in one flow

The playbook view reinforces how intake, tasking, and escalation can remain in the same operational surface as the rest of the investigation.

Phase 01

Triage the lead

Ingest the referral, confirm entities, attach source material, and push the case into the right investigative lane before evidence fragments.

Intake packet approved

Phase 02

Build the operational picture

Link people, accounts, locations, and events into a working graph, assign tasks, and capture analyst judgement where the next shift can see it.

Network and tasking aligned

Phase 03

Package for action

Publish briefing notes, export the evidence set, and hand legal or command staff a case package that already includes provenance, chronology, and open issues.

Briefing and filing package ready
Module stack

Built for operational tempo, not slideware

The workflow pages now anchor on real operator jobs: command visibility, evidence discipline, tasking, and publishable outputs.

Case orchestration

Shared command board

Supervisors and detectives see the same case state, next actions, and unresolved blockers.

Task ownership and due dates stay visible on the case record.
Briefing context does not disappear when the shift changes.
Escalation points are visible before the case ages out.
Analysis

Relationship and entity resolution

Analysts can build the network while keeping investigative notes and confidence calls attached to the same workspace.

Entity merges are visible and reviewable later.
Narrative rationale sits beside the graph instead of in a separate notebook.
Cross-domain pivots are possible without leaving the case context.
Evidence

Court-ready packaging

Exports, filing packets, and leadership briefings inherit the same chronology and evidence links already used by the case team.

Briefings and disclosure exports start from the live case state.
Attachment provenance is preserved through the workflow.
Open issues remain visible instead of getting hidden in a PDF.
Governance

Audit-first handoffs

Every assignment, edit, and export can be tracked without slowing the case team down.

Role-based access and approvals fit the investigative flow.
Audit events stay tied to the underlying case objects.
Supervisory review can happen inside the same workspace.
Proof dossier

Specific enough for real deployment decisions

This product page now reads like a deployment brief: standards, deployment models, and workflow examples instead of abstract platform promises.

Standards

Control and evidence posture

CJIS-aligned operating controls, immutable audit expectations, and export discipline are designed into the workflow instead of added later.
NIST-oriented security language and role-based access patterns line up with the security and safeguards material elsewhere on the site.
Legal package outputs are framed around chronology, provenance, and reviewer visibility rather than a generic “reporting” claim.
Deployment

Deployment models

Cloud, hybrid, gov cloud, and air-gapped deployments are treated as operating choices, not separate products.
The same case flow is intended to survive sovereign and low-connectivity environments.
Workflow ownership stays with the agency instead of embedded consultants.
Examples

Operational examples

Major crime detectives moving from lead intake to warrant package.
Fusion-center analysts packaging a briefing for a task-force commander.
Cross-border teams preserving evidence discipline while handing a case to legal review.

Walk through the case lifecycle with your own review steps

Bring the intake, assignment, supervisor review, and court-prep steps your investigators follow now. We will show how evidence, tasks, and narrative stay on one record.